Chemical Giant Fails to Meet CSR Mandate
New Delhi: Smith N Smith Chemicals Limited has recently come under fire after the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) slapped a hefty penalty on the corporation for failing to adhere to the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) requirements as stipulated under Section 135(5) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Setting the Legal Stage
The MCA, committed to ensuring the proper execution of the Companies Act, had earlier appointed the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana, as the Adjudicating Officer. This move ensured that violations related to the Act, especially those concerning CSR, were dealt with utmost seriousness and diligence.
Smith’s Slip Up
During the Financial Year 2020-21, Smith N Smith Chemicals Limited was expected to spend a sum of Rs. 6,86,480.21 towards CSR activities. However, the company conceded that they had not met this mandate and could only achieve it by 2023, which subsequently raised eyebrows and led to a Show-Cause Notice.
The Defense Strategy
In their defense, Smith N Smith Chemicals stated that the directors were unfamiliar with the new provisions since the CSR mandate had just been imposed on them. They further attributed their inability to meet the requirements to the disruptions wreaked by the COVID-19 pandemic, pleading for a more lenient penalty.
| Section | Details |
|---|---|
| Company Name | Smith N Smith Chemicals Limited |
| Authority | Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) |
| Violation | Section 135(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 |
| CSR Obligation | Rs. 6,86,480.21 (FY 2020-21) |
| Actual Spend By | 2023 |
| Defense Reasons | 1. Lack of awareness among directors<br>2. Disruptions due to COVID-19 |
| Adjudicating Officer | Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana |
| Factors Considered | 1. Admission of default<br>2. Board responsibility under Section 135(5)<br>3. CSR as a Board-driven process |
| Penalty – Company | Rs. 13,72,960.42 |
| Penalty – Directors | Rs. 68,648.02 (each for four directors) |
| Total Penalty | Rs. 16,47,552.5 |
The Verdict’s Underpinnings
Taking into account the company’s acknowledgment of their default, the role of the Board as set out by Section 135(5), and understanding that CSR is a process led by the Board, the Adjudicating Officer rendered his judgment. The penalty was calculated using a precise formula delineated under Section 135(7) of the Act.
Smith N Smith Chemicals Limited was ordered to pay a penalty of Rs. 13,72,960.42. Additionally, each of the company’s four directors faced fines amounting to Rs. 68,648.02 each. In total, the company and its directors were saddled with a penalty of Rs. 16,47,552.5.
A Stern Reminder for the Corporate World
The stringent penalty imposed on Smith N Smith Chemicals underscores the significance of adhering to CSR mandates. This case stands as a stark reminder to corporations and their respective boards regarding the criticality of compliance. As the Adjudicating Officer’s decision indicates, ignorance of the law, even during challenging times, is no excuse. In today’s corporate landscape, a comprehensive understanding of legal mandates, coupled with a robust CSR strategy, is not just commendable but absolutely essential.
Copyright @ IndiaCSR
Chemical Giant Fails to Meet CSR Mandate
New Delhi: Smith N Smith Chemicals Limited has recently come under fire after the Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) slapped a hefty penalty on the corporation for failing to adhere to the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) requirements as stipulated under Section 135(5) of the Companies Act, 2013.
Setting the Legal Stage
The MCA, committed to ensuring the proper execution of the Companies Act, had earlier appointed the Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana, as the Adjudicating Officer. This move ensured that violations related to the Act, especially those concerning CSR, were dealt with utmost seriousness and diligence.
Smith’s Slip Up
During the Financial Year 2020-21, Smith N Smith Chemicals Limited was expected to spend a sum of Rs. 6,86,480.21 towards CSR activities. However, the company conceded that they had not met this mandate and could only achieve it by 2023, which subsequently raised eyebrows and led to a Show-Cause Notice.
The Defense Strategy
In their defense, Smith N Smith Chemicals stated that the directors were unfamiliar with the new provisions since the CSR mandate had just been imposed on them. They further attributed their inability to meet the requirements to the disruptions wreaked by the COVID-19 pandemic, pleading for a more lenient penalty.
| Section | Details |
|---|---|
| Company Name | Smith N Smith Chemicals Limited |
| Authority | Ministry of Corporate Affairs (MCA) |
| Violation | Section 135(5) of the Companies Act, 2013 |
| CSR Obligation | Rs. 6,86,480.21 (FY 2020-21) |
| Actual Spend By | 2023 |
| Defense Reasons | 1. Lack of awareness among directors<br>2. Disruptions due to COVID-19 |
| Adjudicating Officer | Registrar of Companies, NCT of Delhi & Haryana |
| Factors Considered | 1. Admission of default<br>2. Board responsibility under Section 135(5)<br>3. CSR as a Board-driven process |
| Penalty – Company | Rs. 13,72,960.42 |
| Penalty – Directors | Rs. 68,648.02 (each for four directors) |
| Total Penalty | Rs. 16,47,552.5 |
The Verdict’s Underpinnings
Taking into account the company’s acknowledgment of their default, the role of the Board as set out by Section 135(5), and understanding that CSR is a process led by the Board, the Adjudicating Officer rendered his judgment. The penalty was calculated using a precise formula delineated under Section 135(7) of the Act.
Smith N Smith Chemicals Limited was ordered to pay a penalty of Rs. 13,72,960.42. Additionally, each of the company’s four directors faced fines amounting to Rs. 68,648.02 each. In total, the company and its directors were saddled with a penalty of Rs. 16,47,552.5.
A Stern Reminder for the Corporate World
The stringent penalty imposed on Smith N Smith Chemicals underscores the significance of adhering to CSR mandates. This case stands as a stark reminder to corporations and their respective boards regarding the criticality of compliance. As the Adjudicating Officer’s decision indicates, ignorance of the law, even during challenging times, is no excuse. In today’s corporate landscape, a comprehensive understanding of legal mandates, coupled with a robust CSR strategy, is not just commendable but absolutely essential.
Copyright @ IndiaCSR
