The Reserve Bank of India (RBI) has revealed that around Rs 9,760 crore worth of Rs 2000 notes are still with the public, even after the deadline for depositing or exchanging them expired on October 7, 2023. The RBI had announced the withdrawal of Rs 2000 notes from circulation on May 19, 2023, as part of its efforts to curb black money, counterfeiting, and hoarding of high-value currency
The article will explain the reasons and the implications of the public holding on to the Rs 2,000 notes, and will also compare it with the previous demonetization exercise of 2016.
Reasons for the Public Holding on to the Rs 2000 Notes
The reasons for the public holding on to the Rs 2,000 notes are not clear, but some possible explanations are:
The lack of awareness or information
Some people may not be aware of the withdrawal of Rs 2,000 notes, or may not have access to the information or the facilities to deposit or exchange them, especially in the rural and remote areas, where the banking and communication services are poor or absent.
The fear of scrutiny or penalty
Some people may be afraid of depositing or exchanging the Rs 2,000 notes, as they may have to face the scrutiny or the penalty from the authorities, especially if they have acquired the notes from illegal or illicit sources, such as tax evasion, corruption, or crime.
The preference or convenience
Some people may prefer to keep the Rs 2,000 notes, as they may find them convenient or useful for their transactions or savings, especially in the informal or cash-based sectors, where the availability or acceptance of the lower denomination notes or the digital payment modes are low or limited.
Implications of the Public Holding on to the Rs 2,000 Notes
The implications of the public holding on to the Rs 2,000 notes are not certain, but some possible consequences are:
The failure or success of the withdrawal
The public holding on to the Rs 2,000 notes may indicate the failure or the success of the withdrawal of the notes, depending on the perspective or the objective of the exercise. On one hand, it may suggest that the withdrawal has not achieved its intended goals of curbing black money, counterfeiting, and hoarding, as the notes are still in circulation or possession of the public. On the other hand, it may imply that the withdrawal has achieved its desired effects of reducing the demand and supply of the notes, as the notes are not being used or issued for the transactions or payments.
The impact or benefit for the economy
The public holding on to the Rs 2,000 notes may have a positive or a negative impact or benefit for the economy, depending on the extent or the duration of the holding. On one hand, it may have a negative impact or benefit, as it may reduce the money supply and the liquidity in the economy, and may hamper the growth and the development of the country. On the other hand, it may have a positive impact or benefit, as it may increase the tax compliance and the revenue collection, and may boost the digital and the formal economy, which will enhance the transparency and the efficiency of the country.
Comparison with the Previous Demonetization Exercise of 2016
The public holding on to the Rs 2,000 notes can be compared and contrasted with the previous demonetization exercise of 2016, when the RBI had withdrawn the Rs 1,000 and Rs 500 notes from circulation, and had introduced the Rs 2,000 and Rs 500 notes as new legal tender.
Some of the similarities and differences are:
The similarities
Both the exercises were aimed at curbing black money, counterfeiting, and hoarding of high-value currency, and at promoting digital payments and financial inclusion. Both the exercises were announced by the RBI, and were implemented in a phased manner, with a deadline for depositing or exchanging the old notes. Both the exercises faced some challenges and criticisms, such as the inconvenience and disruption for the public and the economy, the shortage and the mismatch of the new notes, and the lack of adequate preparation and communication by the authorities.
The differences
The demonetization exercise of 2016 was more drastic and sudden, as it had invalidated 86% of the currency in circulation, and had given only 50 days for depositing or exchanging the old notes. The withdrawal exercise of 2023 was more gradual and planned, as it had invalidated only 2.7% of the currency in circulation, and had given more than four months for depositing or exchanging the old notes. The demonetization exercise of 2016 had resulted in almost 99% of the old notes being returned to the banking system, while the withdrawal exercise of 2023 had resulted in only 97.26% of the old notes being returned to the banking system.
(India CSR)